·
DataBubble
  • Home
  • Models
  • News
  • Compare
  • Boards
  • Pricing
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Methodology
  • Contact
Latest
Bringing Value Models Back: Generative Critics for Value Modeling in LLM Reinforcement Learning9h◆Subagents vs Agent Skills: Executing Reusable Knowledge for Long-Horizon Agentic Tasks9h◆Distribution-Consistent Inference for Dynamic Sparse Mixture-of-Experts9h◆In RAG We Trust? Measuring Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Under Document Poisoning9h◆FrontierChallenge: Evaluating Scientific Workflow Completion9h◆IBIB: A Protocol for Measuring Enterprise AI Systems by Serving Route, Not Model Identifier9h◆AgenticGen: Reward-Guided Agentic Video Generation for Advertising9h◆Strangers to Themselves: What Language Models Say About Themselves Is Generic9h◆Omni Interaction Agent Technical Report9h◆CoGReV: A Confidence-Gated Post-Hoc Non-Monotonic Belief Revision Framework for Phishing Website Classification9h◆Bit-Flip Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models: Action-Decoding Architecture Shapes the Vulnerability9h◆Can Foundation Models Moderate Online Content? Evaluating Instruction- vs. Example-Driven Policy Operationalization9h◆RiLM: Parameter-Efficient Language Modeling via Geodesic Decoding9h◆Tracing Computation Density in LLMs9h◆Cultural Binding Heads in Language Models9h◆Direct Diversity Optimization for Diverse Successful Trajectories in Preference Post-Training9h◆Left-Branching Transformers Excel at Right-Branching Languages: Data Shapes Word Order Preferences in Language Models9h◆Palmyra x6 Technical Report: An Agentic, Tool-Use Model Post-Trained via Anchored Supervised Fine-Tuning9h◆'Ghaib in Translation' aka Unseen Harm: Measuring Cross-Script Safety Inconsistency with 'Missed-in-Urdu' Scores in LLM Hate Speech Detection9h◆DexterSQL: Deep Schema Exploration and Rule-based Correction for Text-to-SQL Generation9h◆Bringing Value Models Back: Generative Critics for Value Modeling in LLM Reinforcement Learning9h◆Subagents vs Agent Skills: Executing Reusable Knowledge for Long-Horizon Agentic Tasks9h◆Distribution-Consistent Inference for Dynamic Sparse Mixture-of-Experts9h◆In RAG We Trust? Measuring Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Under Document Poisoning9h◆FrontierChallenge: Evaluating Scientific Workflow Completion9h◆IBIB: A Protocol for Measuring Enterprise AI Systems by Serving Route, Not Model Identifier9h◆AgenticGen: Reward-Guided Agentic Video Generation for Advertising9h◆Strangers to Themselves: What Language Models Say About Themselves Is Generic9h◆Omni Interaction Agent Technical Report9h◆CoGReV: A Confidence-Gated Post-Hoc Non-Monotonic Belief Revision Framework for Phishing Website Classification9h◆Bit-Flip Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models: Action-Decoding Architecture Shapes the Vulnerability9h◆Can Foundation Models Moderate Online Content? Evaluating Instruction- vs. Example-Driven Policy Operationalization9h◆RiLM: Parameter-Efficient Language Modeling via Geodesic Decoding9h◆Tracing Computation Density in LLMs9h◆Cultural Binding Heads in Language Models9h◆Direct Diversity Optimization for Diverse Successful Trajectories in Preference Post-Training9h◆Left-Branching Transformers Excel at Right-Branching Languages: Data Shapes Word Order Preferences in Language Models9h◆Palmyra x6 Technical Report: An Agentic, Tool-Use Model Post-Trained via Anchored Supervised Fine-Tuning9h◆'Ghaib in Translation' aka Unseen Harm: Measuring Cross-Script Safety Inconsistency with 'Missed-in-Urdu' Scores in LLM Hate Speech Detection9h◆DexterSQL: Deep Schema Exploration and Rule-based Correction for Text-to-SQL Generation9h◆
News/Sample More, Reflect Less: Self-Refine and Reflexion Lose to Repeated Sampling at Equal Token Cost, from 1.5B to 7B
arxiv
PublishedJuly 31, 2026 at 4:00 AM
—neutral

Sample More, Reflect Less: Self-Refine and Reflexion Lose to Repeated Sampling at Equal Token Cost, from 1.5B to 7B

Source
arxiv.orgfull article ↗
Read on arxiv→
Publisher summary· verbatim

arXiv:2607.28576v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Methods that make a language model plan, criticise and rewrite its own answer, reflect on mistakes, pick the best of several attempts, or debate with copies of itself nearly all make it generate far more text than a single chain of thought. Because gen

Stay posted· Newsletter

A 5-min weekly brief — top movers, price watch, story of the week.

// no spam · unsubscribe one-click · free forever

Discussion
Source
↗
arxiv
Read original ↗All from arxiv →
Tags
04
#open-source#community#collaboration#research
Mentioned companies
05
arXivHuggingfaceDagsHubGotitPubScienceCast

No replies yet. Be first.

Source
↗
arxiv
Read original ↗All from arxiv →
Tags
04
#open-source#community#collaboration#research
Mentioned companies
05
arXivHuggingfaceDagsHubGotitPubScienceCast

Related coverage

More from ARXIV
arxivBringing Value Models Back: Generative Critics for Value Modeling in LLM Reinforcement Learning9harxivSubagents vs Agent Skills: Executing Reusable Knowledge for Long-Horizon Agentic Tasks9harxivDistribution-Consistent Inference for Dynamic Sparse Mixture-of-Experts9harxivIn RAG We Trust? Measuring Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Under Document Poisoning9h
The Bubble Brief
WEEKLY

Read open-source insights every Tuesday — top movers, new releases, story of the week.

// no spam · unsubscribe one-click · free forever

Originally published on arxiv ↗
HomeModelsNews