·
DataBubble
  • Home
  • Models
  • News
  • Compare
  • Boards
  • Pricing
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Methodology
  • Contact
Latest
Bringing Value Models Back: Generative Critics for Value Modeling in LLM Reinforcement Learning6h◆Subagents vs Agent Skills: Executing Reusable Knowledge for Long-Horizon Agentic Tasks6h◆Distribution-Consistent Inference for Dynamic Sparse Mixture-of-Experts6h◆In RAG We Trust? Measuring Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Under Document Poisoning6h◆FrontierChallenge: Evaluating Scientific Workflow Completion6h◆IBIB: A Protocol for Measuring Enterprise AI Systems by Serving Route, Not Model Identifier6h◆AgenticGen: Reward-Guided Agentic Video Generation for Advertising6h◆Strangers to Themselves: What Language Models Say About Themselves Is Generic6h◆Omni Interaction Agent Technical Report6h◆CoGReV: A Confidence-Gated Post-Hoc Non-Monotonic Belief Revision Framework for Phishing Website Classification6h◆Bit-Flip Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models: Action-Decoding Architecture Shapes the Vulnerability6h◆Can Foundation Models Moderate Online Content? Evaluating Instruction- vs. Example-Driven Policy Operationalization6h◆RiLM: Parameter-Efficient Language Modeling via Geodesic Decoding6h◆Tracing Computation Density in LLMs6h◆Cultural Binding Heads in Language Models6h◆Direct Diversity Optimization for Diverse Successful Trajectories in Preference Post-Training6h◆Left-Branching Transformers Excel at Right-Branching Languages: Data Shapes Word Order Preferences in Language Models6h◆Palmyra x6 Technical Report: An Agentic, Tool-Use Model Post-Trained via Anchored Supervised Fine-Tuning6h◆'Ghaib in Translation' aka Unseen Harm: Measuring Cross-Script Safety Inconsistency with 'Missed-in-Urdu' Scores in LLM Hate Speech Detection6h◆DexterSQL: Deep Schema Exploration and Rule-based Correction for Text-to-SQL Generation6h◆Bringing Value Models Back: Generative Critics for Value Modeling in LLM Reinforcement Learning6h◆Subagents vs Agent Skills: Executing Reusable Knowledge for Long-Horizon Agentic Tasks6h◆Distribution-Consistent Inference for Dynamic Sparse Mixture-of-Experts6h◆In RAG We Trust? Measuring Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Under Document Poisoning6h◆FrontierChallenge: Evaluating Scientific Workflow Completion6h◆IBIB: A Protocol for Measuring Enterprise AI Systems by Serving Route, Not Model Identifier6h◆AgenticGen: Reward-Guided Agentic Video Generation for Advertising6h◆Strangers to Themselves: What Language Models Say About Themselves Is Generic6h◆Omni Interaction Agent Technical Report6h◆CoGReV: A Confidence-Gated Post-Hoc Non-Monotonic Belief Revision Framework for Phishing Website Classification6h◆Bit-Flip Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models: Action-Decoding Architecture Shapes the Vulnerability6h◆Can Foundation Models Moderate Online Content? Evaluating Instruction- vs. Example-Driven Policy Operationalization6h◆RiLM: Parameter-Efficient Language Modeling via Geodesic Decoding6h◆Tracing Computation Density in LLMs6h◆Cultural Binding Heads in Language Models6h◆Direct Diversity Optimization for Diverse Successful Trajectories in Preference Post-Training6h◆Left-Branching Transformers Excel at Right-Branching Languages: Data Shapes Word Order Preferences in Language Models6h◆Palmyra x6 Technical Report: An Agentic, Tool-Use Model Post-Trained via Anchored Supervised Fine-Tuning6h◆'Ghaib in Translation' aka Unseen Harm: Measuring Cross-Script Safety Inconsistency with 'Missed-in-Urdu' Scores in LLM Hate Speech Detection6h◆DexterSQL: Deep Schema Exploration and Rule-based Correction for Text-to-SQL Generation6h◆
DataBubble·

Model Detail

google logo

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

—
Provider: GoogleCategory: multimodal
DB Score
61.5
Downloads
0
Likes
0
Day
+0.0%
Week
+0.0%
Month
+0.0%
Overview

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is a multimodal model released by Google. And supports text+image+file+audio+video->text inputs.

Performance

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview reports a Chatbot Arena ELO of 1,487 across 102,999 votes. Other benchmark slots are still empty in our dataset, so this single figure is best read as a partial picture rather than a full evaluation.

How we score this →
Pricing & Throughput

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is priced at $2/M input tokens and $12/M output tokens. Operationally the model offers a 1049K-token context window, which matters when sizing it for prompt-heavy or latency-sensitive workloads. Pricing in this range is the working middle of the API market — neither the cheapest nor the most expensive option per token, so cost-fit is usually a function of how much output you generate.

Technical

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is published on Hugging Face but our pipeline has not yet captured architecture, license, or parameter-count metadata for this entry. The data is refreshed daily, so these fields typically populate within 24–48 hours of release.

Use Cases

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is best fit for mixed text-and-image reasoning tasks such as document understanding, and long-context tasks such as full-codebase analysis or book-length summarization (1049K tokens). Treat this as a starting matrix rather than a benchmark verdict — the right deployment usually depends on the specific evaluation suite that mirrors your workload.

Download History
Pricing
Input ($/M tokens)
$2
Output ($/M tokens)
$12
Context Window
1049K
Arena & Community
Arena ELO
1,487
Arena Votes
102,999
Model Info
Modalitytext+image+file+audio+video->text
Recent newsView all news →
Related News
techcrunchneutral5d ago

Hikers rescued after using Google Gemini for planning

The sheriff’s office said the hikers “were advised by Gemini to bring far less food and water than their group required."

techcrunchneutral6d ago

Google’s Gemini Spark can now manage your Google Photos library

Gemini Spark can edit and curate photo albums, create shared collections, turn photos into calendar events, and handle other Google Photos tasks for AI Pro and Ultra subscribers.

Google says its new Gemini 3.8 Flash model ‘works harder’ but might cost more
thevergeneutral8d ago

Google says its new Gemini 3.8 Flash model ‘works harder’ but might cost more

Google launched Gemini 3.8 Flash, arriving just a few weeks after its predecessor. The company claims the new model "works harder" than Gemini 3.7 Flash by performing more reasoning steps on complex tasks and "calling tools iteratively." It has the same introductory pricing as 3.7 Flash, $0.75 per m

arxiv10d ago

Development of an Autonomous AI Coding Agent using Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) and Gemini LLM Frameworks

arXiv:2608.29096v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The ongoing changes in software engineering requirements have created a substantial need for automated tools which can create secure source code from natural language input. The performance of traditional Large Language Models (LLMs) becomes limited

arxivneutral11d ago

The Granularity Gap: A Multi-Dimensional Cross-Generational Audit of Sycophancy in Gemini Models

arXiv:2606.05183v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Pass/fail safety evaluation reports whether a model refused. It does not report how far a model went to please the user, and we show these are close to different measurements. We audited sycophancy across three Gemini generations, scoring N=8,830 r

arxivneutral13d ago

Accelerating Scientific Research with Gemini in the Real-World

arXiv:2608.26701v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present an extension and comprehensive real-world validation of Co-Scientist, a Gemini-based multi-agent system designed to accelerate end-to-end scientific research across hypothesis generation, experimentation, and manuscript generation. Moving be

Related Models
google logo
gemma-4-31B-it
Google · 8.7M downloads
google logo
gemma-4-26B-A4B-it
Google · 8.6M downloads
Qwen logo
Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
Qwen · 22.5M downloads
Qwen logo
Qwen3.5-9B
Qwen · 10.9M downloads
HomeModelsNews