arxiv
PublishedJuly 14, 2026 at 4:00 AM
Articulate Intuition or Genuine Analysis? Benchmarking Epistemic Reliability in LLM-as-a-Judge Peer Reviews
Publisher summary· verbatim
arXiv:2607.10511v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When an LLM judge calls a peer review analytical and a human committee calls another review high quality, are they tracking the same thing? We argue they are not, and that the difference matters philosophically. We operationalise Kahneman's dual-proces
Stay posted· Newsletter
A 5-min weekly brief — top movers, price watch, story of the week.
Discussion
No replies yet. Be first.
Related coverage
More from ARXIV
arxivMJ: Multi-turn LLM Jailbreaking via Decomposed Credit Assignment4harxivQuery-Focused Event Summarization: A Dataset and Benchmark4harxivFedCausal-Dyn: A Causal-Dynamic Paradigm for Federated Learning under Dynamic Feature Drift4harxivSafe responses matter: Output-aware safety guardrail mitigate over-refusal in MLLMs4hThe Bubble Brief
WEEKLYRead AI insights every Tuesday — top movers, new releases, story of the week.
Originally published on arxiv ↗