arxiv
PublishedJuly 2, 2026 at 4:00 AM
—neutral
Phantom References: Hallucinated Citations That Survive Peer Review at Top-Tier Conferences
Publisher summary· verbatim
arXiv:2607.00738v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models can generate polished scientific text that includes unsupported claims, allowing hallucinations to enter the archival record. Assessing this risk via technical statements is difficult and often requires expert judgment, but cita
Stay posted· Newsletter
A 5-min weekly brief — top movers, price watch, story of the week.
Discussion
No replies yet. Be first.
Related coverage
More from ARXIV
arxivMulti-Agent Collaborative Reasoning with Tool-Augmented Evidence for Urban Region Profiling10harxivSemaDiff: Identifying Semantic-Changing Commits with Generated Code and Tests10harxivMASPRM: Multi-Agent System Process Reward Model10harxivDelving into the Temporal Challenges of Unified Video Protection Against Image-to-Video and Fine-Tuning-based Customization10hThe Bubble Brief
WEEKLYRead AI insights every Tuesday — top movers, new releases, story of the week.
Originally published on arxiv ↗