arxiv
PublishedSeptember 11, 2026 at 4:00 AM
—neutral
RAP: Research Attention Prediction Reveals Target-Conditioned Evidence Acquisition Biases
Publisher summary· verbatim
arXiv:2609.10092v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) increasingly act as research agents, yet their ability to track shifts in research attention is difficult to evaluate because reviews and research ideas lack uniquely verifiable outcomes. We introduce Research Attention Pre
Stay posted· Newsletter
A 5-min weekly brief — top movers, price watch, story of the week.
Discussion
No replies yet. Be first.
Related coverage
More from ARXIV
arxivBringing Value Models Back: Generative Critics for Value Modeling in LLM Reinforcement Learning8harxivSubagents vs Agent Skills: Executing Reusable Knowledge for Long-Horizon Agentic Tasks8harxivDistribution-Consistent Inference for Dynamic Sparse Mixture-of-Experts8harxivIn RAG We Trust? Measuring Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Under Document Poisoning8hThe Bubble Brief
WEEKLYRead AI insights every Tuesday — top movers, new releases, story of the week.
Originally published on arxiv ↗