arxiv
PublishedSeptember 1, 2026 at 4:00 AM
Which Metrics Save the Most Human Annotation? Prediction-Powered Evaluation and Meta-Evaluation
Publisher summary· verbatim
arXiv:2608.26638v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Across various non-verifiable tasks, human evaluation is reliable but expensive, while automatic metrics are more scalable but often biased. Building on prediction-powered inference (PPI), we propose prediction-powered evaluation, a framework that
Stay posted· Newsletter
A 5-min weekly brief — top movers, price watch, story of the week.
Discussion
No replies yet. Be first.
Related coverage
More from ARXIV
arxivMeta-ethics and AI: exploring the novel meta-ethical questions in the era of AI1harxivSSAKG 2.0: An Open-Source Package for Structural Associative Sequence Memory and Context-Based Retrieval1harxivEpistemic Sybil Resistance: Multiplying AI Agents Without Multiplying Evidence1harxivDocHop: Benchmarking Out-of-domain Multi-hop Reasoning in Information-Dense Documents1hThe Bubble Brief
WEEKLYRead AI insights every Tuesday — top movers, new releases, story of the week.
Originally published on arxiv ↗