Model Detail
Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B-GGUF-MTP
▲ 4.3%Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B-GGUF-MTP is a code generation model with 35B parameters released by peculiar-ragdoll. The model is registered under the image-text-to-text pipeline tag on Hugging Face, distributed under the permissive mit license.
Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B-GGUF-MTP ships with 35B parameters, distributed as a quantized weight variant for lower-VRAM inference. The mit license is permissive, allowing commercial deployment and derivative work without per-seat fees, though attribution requirements still apply.
Downloads of Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B-GGUF-MTP have moved +4.3% over the past 24 hours, +43.3% over the trailing seven days, +1873.1% over the trailing thirty days. That puts the model in active uptrend territory; a sustained move of this size usually reflects a recent release, a viral integration, or a benchmark surprise rather than steady-state demand. These numbers are signal, not guarantee — week-over-week download counts on Hugging Face also reflect mirror traffic, CI scrapes, and one-off benchmarking runs.
Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B-GGUF-MTP is best fit for code completion, repository-scale Q&A, and pair-programming integrations. It is a less obvious choice for one-shot generation of security-critical code without review. Treat this as a starting matrix rather than a benchmark verdict — the right deployment usually depends on the specific evaluation suite that mirrors your workload.
Every Model Cheats: Prompt-Level Mitigation of Cheating on Offensive Cyber Tasks
arXiv:2607.21763v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents routinely cheat on cybersecurity benchmarks, inflating reported pass rates far beyond genuine capability. Prior audits of Cybench found cheating in 0.3-3.4% of traces, implicating only a handful of models. We
From Natural Language Intent to Executable Control: Hierarchical Feedback-Guided LLM Planning for Multi-component Cyber-Physical Systems
arXiv:2610.22441v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) provide a convenient interface for translating natural language commands into task plans for cyber-physical systems (CPSs). However, two gaps hinder their use for real execution: generated plans may misinterpret or omit the
CTI2TTP: Evidence-Grounded TTP Extraction from Cyber Threat Intelligence via Diverge-then-Converge Verification
arXiv:2605.25836v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Extracting MITRE ATT&CK techniques from cyber threat intelligence (CTI) reports is an open-set, multi-label problem requiring both high recall (not missing techniques) and high precision (not hallucinating unsupported ones). Existing rule-bas
From Unreliable to Usable: Decomposing Failure Modes and Confidence Signals in LLM Entity Extraction - Evidence from Cyber Threat Intelligence
arXiv:2610.20417v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Audits of large language model (LLM) extraction from full-length documents report severe unreliability, leaving two questions open: what the failures actually consist of, and whether confidence signals can turn unreliable output into usable output. We
Ask the Expert: LLM-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Cyber Defense
arXiv:2610.09337v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Policy-based reinforcement learning (RL) approaches have produced promising results for autonomous cyber defense; however, they are sample-inefficient in settings where defenders must respond under delayed, partial observations with actions from larg
Polar: LLM-Powered Synthesis of Real-World Cyber Evidence for Prioritization and Mitigation
arXiv:2610.07298v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Cyber threat analysis increasingly depends on evidence distributed across vendor advisories, vulnerability databases, and threat intelligence sources. Turning these fragmented observations into timely decisions requires models to connect technical se
