·
DataBubble
  • Home
  • Models
  • News
  • Compare
  • Boards
  • Pricing
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Methodology
  • Contact
Latest
AI music maker Suno now generates spoken words3h◆Don’t be fooled—LLMs don’t reason5h◆AutoSynthData: Generating Training Data for Enterprise Agents9h◆On the (In)effectiveness of AMR Augmentation for Large Language Models9h◆cua-speedrun: Standardized Benchmarking of the Speed of Computer-Use Agents9h◆Mitigating Memorization In Language Models9h◆MoEless: Efficient MoE LLM Serving with Serverless Experts9h◆Fork-Think with Confidence9h◆A Moving-Horizon Approximate Branch-and-Reduce Method for Deep Classification Trees9h◆Bongard: Training Machine Intuition9h◆Inference Auctions9h◆DEdit: Iterative Draft Editing for Speculative Decoding9h◆4MT-VLM: How Coarse Is a VLMs Cognitive Map?9h◆JuryFlow: Disagreement-Guided Human-in-the-Loop Multi-Agent Evaluation9h◆OverdoseMoE: A Multi-Expert Framework for Opioid Overdose Risk Prediction9h◆Values as Style: Disentangling Values from Semantics with One-Way Mixing for Low-Damage LLM Steering9h◆OverForge: Reasoning Through Strategies and Tactics Helps Cooperative Lifelong Adaptation9h◆JusticeAxis: Benchmarking Legal Judgment between Rigid Rule Application and Ungrounded Discretion9h◆KilometerVision: A New Frontier for Large-Scale Spatial Intelligence in VLMs9h◆Flowing Faster to Coordinate: One-Step Online Multi-Agent Flow Policies9h◆AI music maker Suno now generates spoken words3h◆Don’t be fooled—LLMs don’t reason5h◆AutoSynthData: Generating Training Data for Enterprise Agents9h◆On the (In)effectiveness of AMR Augmentation for Large Language Models9h◆cua-speedrun: Standardized Benchmarking of the Speed of Computer-Use Agents9h◆Mitigating Memorization In Language Models9h◆MoEless: Efficient MoE LLM Serving with Serverless Experts9h◆Fork-Think with Confidence9h◆A Moving-Horizon Approximate Branch-and-Reduce Method for Deep Classification Trees9h◆Bongard: Training Machine Intuition9h◆Inference Auctions9h◆DEdit: Iterative Draft Editing for Speculative Decoding9h◆4MT-VLM: How Coarse Is a VLMs Cognitive Map?9h◆JuryFlow: Disagreement-Guided Human-in-the-Loop Multi-Agent Evaluation9h◆OverdoseMoE: A Multi-Expert Framework for Opioid Overdose Risk Prediction9h◆Values as Style: Disentangling Values from Semantics with One-Way Mixing for Low-Damage LLM Steering9h◆OverForge: Reasoning Through Strategies and Tactics Helps Cooperative Lifelong Adaptation9h◆JusticeAxis: Benchmarking Legal Judgment between Rigid Rule Application and Ungrounded Discretion9h◆KilometerVision: A New Frontier for Large-Scale Spatial Intelligence in VLMs9h◆Flowing Faster to Coordinate: One-Step Online Multi-Agent Flow Policies9h◆
News/4MT-VLM: How Coarse Is a VLMs Cognitive Map?
arxiv
PublishedOctober 2, 2026 at 4:00 AM
—neutral

4MT-VLM: How Coarse Is a VLMs Cognitive Map?

Source
arxiv.orgfull article ↗
Read on arxiv→
Publisher summary· verbatim

arXiv:2609.39238v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: An agent that moves must recognise a place from a viewpoint it has never seen. We introduce 4MT-VLM, a dataset of procedurally generated landscapes, each rendered across five stimulus modes that remove appearance cues while holding layout fixed: shape

Stay posted· Newsletter

A 5-min weekly brief — top movers, price watch, story of the week.

// no spam · unsubscribe one-click · free forever

Discussion
Source
↗
arxiv
Read original ↗All from arxiv →

No replies yet. Be first.

Source
↗
arxiv
Read original ↗All from arxiv →

Related coverage

More from ARXIV
arxivOn the (In)effectiveness of AMR Augmentation for Large Language Models9harxivcua-speedrun: Standardized Benchmarking of the Speed of Computer-Use Agents9harxivMitigating Memorization In Language Models9harxivMoEless: Efficient MoE LLM Serving with Serverless Experts9h
The Bubble Brief
WEEKLY

Read AI insights every Tuesday — top movers, new releases, story of the week.

// no spam · unsubscribe one-click · free forever

Originally published on arxiv ↗
Built by Marouane Gazouzi
HomeModelsNews