·
DataBubble
  • Home
  • Models
  • News
  • Compare
  • Boards
  • Pricing
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Methodology
  • Contact
Latest
AI music maker Suno now generates spoken words2h◆Don’t be fooled—LLMs don’t reason4h◆AutoSynthData: Generating Training Data for Enterprise Agents8h◆On the (In)effectiveness of AMR Augmentation for Large Language Models8h◆cua-speedrun: Standardized Benchmarking of the Speed of Computer-Use Agents8h◆Mitigating Memorization In Language Models8h◆MoEless: Efficient MoE LLM Serving with Serverless Experts8h◆Fork-Think with Confidence8h◆A Moving-Horizon Approximate Branch-and-Reduce Method for Deep Classification Trees8h◆Bongard: Training Machine Intuition8h◆Inference Auctions8h◆DEdit: Iterative Draft Editing for Speculative Decoding8h◆4MT-VLM: How Coarse Is a VLMs Cognitive Map?8h◆JuryFlow: Disagreement-Guided Human-in-the-Loop Multi-Agent Evaluation8h◆OverdoseMoE: A Multi-Expert Framework for Opioid Overdose Risk Prediction8h◆Values as Style: Disentangling Values from Semantics with One-Way Mixing for Low-Damage LLM Steering8h◆OverForge: Reasoning Through Strategies and Tactics Helps Cooperative Lifelong Adaptation8h◆JusticeAxis: Benchmarking Legal Judgment between Rigid Rule Application and Ungrounded Discretion8h◆KilometerVision: A New Frontier for Large-Scale Spatial Intelligence in VLMs8h◆Flowing Faster to Coordinate: One-Step Online Multi-Agent Flow Policies8h◆AI music maker Suno now generates spoken words2h◆Don’t be fooled—LLMs don’t reason4h◆AutoSynthData: Generating Training Data for Enterprise Agents8h◆On the (In)effectiveness of AMR Augmentation for Large Language Models8h◆cua-speedrun: Standardized Benchmarking of the Speed of Computer-Use Agents8h◆Mitigating Memorization In Language Models8h◆MoEless: Efficient MoE LLM Serving with Serverless Experts8h◆Fork-Think with Confidence8h◆A Moving-Horizon Approximate Branch-and-Reduce Method for Deep Classification Trees8h◆Bongard: Training Machine Intuition8h◆Inference Auctions8h◆DEdit: Iterative Draft Editing for Speculative Decoding8h◆4MT-VLM: How Coarse Is a VLMs Cognitive Map?8h◆JuryFlow: Disagreement-Guided Human-in-the-Loop Multi-Agent Evaluation8h◆OverdoseMoE: A Multi-Expert Framework for Opioid Overdose Risk Prediction8h◆Values as Style: Disentangling Values from Semantics with One-Way Mixing for Low-Damage LLM Steering8h◆OverForge: Reasoning Through Strategies and Tactics Helps Cooperative Lifelong Adaptation8h◆JusticeAxis: Benchmarking Legal Judgment between Rigid Rule Application and Ungrounded Discretion8h◆KilometerVision: A New Frontier for Large-Scale Spatial Intelligence in VLMs8h◆Flowing Faster to Coordinate: One-Step Online Multi-Agent Flow Policies8h◆
News/Don’t be fooled—LLMs don’t reason
mit-tech-review
PublishedOctober 2, 2026 at 8:00 AM
—neutral

Don’t be fooled—LLMs don’t reason

Source
technologyreview.comfull article ↗
Read on mit-tech-review→
Publisher summary· verbatim

On an afternoon in Seoul in March 2016, I watched a program I helped build put a stone on the fifth line of a Go board in what looked like a gift to its human opponent. Move 37 in game two of the five-game match looked so absurd that some commentators thought it was a programming glitch. It wasn’t.

Stay posted· Newsletter

A 5-min weekly brief — top movers, price watch, story of the week.

// no spam · unsubscribe one-click · free forever

Discussion
Source
↗
mit-tech-review
Read original ↗All from mit-tech-review →

No replies yet. Be first.

Source
↗
mit-tech-review
Read original ↗All from mit-tech-review →
The Bubble Brief
WEEKLY

Read AI insights every Tuesday — top movers, new releases, story of the week.

// no spam · unsubscribe one-click · free forever

Originally published on mit-tech-review ↗
Built by Marouane Gazouzi
HomeModelsNews