arxiv
PublishedMay 26, 2026 at 4:00 AM
Beyond the Final Answer: Evaluating the Reasoning Trajectories of Tool-Augmented Agents
Publisher summary· verbatim
arXiv:2510.02837v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Although recent tool-augmented benchmarks involve complex requests, evaluation remains limited to answer matching, neglecting critical trajectory aspects like efficiency, hallucination, and adaptivity. The most straightforward method for evaluation
Stay posted· Newsletter
Three short emails a week: Monday, Wednesday and Friday. Top movers, new models and the most-referenced story.
Your email is used only to send The Bubble Brief. Privacy policy
Discussion
No replies yet. Be first.
Related coverage
More from ARXIV
arxivOptimal Hydra: Model Heterogeneous Federated Learning for LLMs using Data-Informed Hydra-Nets14harxivJudging the Judges: Confidence and Disagreement in Rubrics as Rewards14harxivContent associations with answer selection and engagement in supply chain community question answering14harxivORACLE-SWE: Quantifying the Contribution of Critical Information Signals on SWE Agents14hThe Bubble Brief
MON · WED · FRIRead AI insights every Monday, Wednesday and Friday — top movers, new models, story of the week.
Your email is used only to send The Bubble Brief. Privacy policy
Originally published on arxiv ↗