·
DataBubble
  • Home
  • Models
  • News
  • Compare
  • Boards
  • Pricing
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Methodology
  • Contact
Latest
Figma announces new features to define how agents work on its platform1h◆Ground-Truth Subgraphs for Better Training and Evaluation of Knowledge Graph Augmented LLMs1h◆The Instability of Safety: How Random Seeds and Temperature Expose Inconsistent LLM Refusal Behavior1h◆Dual-Evolving Reinforcement Learning for Automated Reward Design1h◆SWE-Spot: Building Small Repo-Experts with Repository-Centric Learning1h◆When Is Enough Not Enough? Illusory Completion in Search Agents1h◆Semantic Communities and Boundary-Spanning Lyrics in K-pop: A Graph-Based Unsupervised Analysis1h◆Learning Reusable Agent Subroutines from Experience1h◆AgentWorld: A Data Factory for Training LLM Agents from Multi-Turn Interactions1h◆What Does a Discrete Diffusion Model Learn? One Reverse Process in Three Coordinates1h◆CausalDS: Benchmarking Causal Reasoning in Data-Science Agents1h◆SPARK: Learning from Verification in Speculative GRPO Rollouts1h◆Rubric Dropout: A Simple Way to Mitigate Reward Hacking in Rubric-as-Reward RL1h◆AVA-Encoder: Towards Agent-Native Video Representation Learning1h◆Mechanistic Circuit Identification for Controllable Data Generation1h◆The Dice Roll Method: A Standardized Protocol for Repeated-Query Auditing of Large Language Model Brand Recommendations1h◆A Computational Framework for Modelling Organisation-Level Semantic Identity from Longitudinal Textual Data1h◆SecJev: Bringing Security Expertise to System One Decision Models1h◆Lost in the bf16 Cast: Exporting Ternary Language Models Can Revert Most Low-Learning-Rate Code Changes1h◆Inverse Reasoning Models for Efficient Post-Training and Verification from Answer-Only Data1h◆Figma announces new features to define how agents work on its platform1h◆Ground-Truth Subgraphs for Better Training and Evaluation of Knowledge Graph Augmented LLMs1h◆The Instability of Safety: How Random Seeds and Temperature Expose Inconsistent LLM Refusal Behavior1h◆Dual-Evolving Reinforcement Learning for Automated Reward Design1h◆SWE-Spot: Building Small Repo-Experts with Repository-Centric Learning1h◆When Is Enough Not Enough? Illusory Completion in Search Agents1h◆Semantic Communities and Boundary-Spanning Lyrics in K-pop: A Graph-Based Unsupervised Analysis1h◆Learning Reusable Agent Subroutines from Experience1h◆AgentWorld: A Data Factory for Training LLM Agents from Multi-Turn Interactions1h◆What Does a Discrete Diffusion Model Learn? One Reverse Process in Three Coordinates1h◆CausalDS: Benchmarking Causal Reasoning in Data-Science Agents1h◆SPARK: Learning from Verification in Speculative GRPO Rollouts1h◆Rubric Dropout: A Simple Way to Mitigate Reward Hacking in Rubric-as-Reward RL1h◆AVA-Encoder: Towards Agent-Native Video Representation Learning1h◆Mechanistic Circuit Identification for Controllable Data Generation1h◆The Dice Roll Method: A Standardized Protocol for Repeated-Query Auditing of Large Language Model Brand Recommendations1h◆A Computational Framework for Modelling Organisation-Level Semantic Identity from Longitudinal Textual Data1h◆SecJev: Bringing Security Expertise to System One Decision Models1h◆Lost in the bf16 Cast: Exporting Ternary Language Models Can Revert Most Low-Learning-Rate Code Changes1h◆Inverse Reasoning Models for Efficient Post-Training and Verification from Answer-Only Data1h◆
News/Coding-Agent Benchmarks Should Match Their Users' Task Flows
arxiv
PublishedOctober 8, 2026 at 4:00 AM

Coding-Agent Benchmarks Should Match Their Users' Task Flows

Source
arxiv.orgfull article ↗
Read on arxiv→
Publisher summary· verbatim

arXiv:2610.09633v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The evaluation of coding agents generally strives to be as realistic as possible. In our study, we collect 4,782 agent sessions of real software engineers in JetBrains IDEs, which we call Production Sessions. Since our subject is interactive agents,

Stay posted· Newsletter

Three short emails a week: Monday, Wednesday and Friday. Top movers, new models and the most-referenced story.

// no spam · unsubscribe one-click · free forever

Your email is used only to send The Bubble Brief. Privacy policy

Discussion
Source
↗
arxiv
Read original ↗All from arxiv →

No replies yet. Be first.

Source
↗
arxiv
Read original ↗All from arxiv →

Related coverage

More from ARXIV
arxivGround-Truth Subgraphs for Better Training and Evaluation of Knowledge Graph Augmented LLMs1harxivThe Instability of Safety: How Random Seeds and Temperature Expose Inconsistent LLM Refusal Behavior1harxivDual-Evolving Reinforcement Learning for Automated Reward Design1harxivSWE-Spot: Building Small Repo-Experts with Repository-Centric Learning1h
The Bubble Brief
MON · WED · FRI

Read AI insights every Monday, Wednesday and Friday — top movers, new models, story of the week.

// no spam · unsubscribe one-click · free forever

Your email is used only to send The Bubble Brief. Privacy policy

Originally published on arxiv ↗
PrivacyTermsRefundsLegal notice|AboutMethodologyContact

© 2026 Databubble

Built by Marouane Gazouzi · Readyo, AI interview coach

HomeModelsNews