arxiv
PublishedSeptember 30, 2026 at 4:00 AM
JEV vs. LLMs as Rubric Judges: Cheaper, Faster, and Wrong in the Same Places
Publisher summary· verbatim
arXiv:2609.29769v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: LLM judges score outputs against rubrics well enough to have become the norm, both in benchmarks and as rewards for training. Jev, a classifier-like alternative its creators call a "decision model", returns probabilities over permitted answers with
Stay posted· Newsletter
Three short emails a week: Monday, Wednesday and Friday. Top movers, new models and the most-referenced story.
Your email is used only to send The Bubble Brief. Privacy policy
Discussion
No replies yet. Be first.
Related coverage
More from ARXIV
arxivOptimal Hydra: Model Heterogeneous Federated Learning for LLMs using Data-Informed Hydra-Nets23harxivJudging the Judges: Confidence and Disagreement in Rubrics as Rewards23harxivContent associations with answer selection and engagement in supply chain community question answering23harxivORACLE-SWE: Quantifying the Contribution of Critical Information Signals on SWE Agents23hThe Bubble Brief
MON · WED · FRIRead AI insights every Monday, Wednesday and Friday — top movers, new models, story of the week.
Your email is used only to send The Bubble Brief. Privacy policy
Originally published on arxiv ↗