·
DataBubble
  • Home
  • Models
  • News
  • Compare
  • Boards
  • Pricing
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Methodology
  • Contact
Latest
The Steering Budget: Examples beat Knobs31m◆Polestar: Drift-Aware Cache Calibration and Token Commitment for Efficient Inference of Diffusion LLMs31m◆RxBrain: Embodied Cognition Foundation Model with Joint Language-Visual Reasoning and Imagination31m◆When a Verified World Model Still Loses: Play-Adequacy vs Prediction-Accuracy in LLM-Synthesized Code World Models31m◆SAGA: Schema-Aware Grounding for Agentic Text-to-SPARQL Generation31m◆ReasFlow: Assisting Reasoning-Centric Scientific Discovery in Applied Mathematics via a Knowledge-Based Multi-Agent System31m◆LBA: Textual Hard-Label Adversarial Attack under Low Query Budgets31m◆Eta Given Delta: Defining LLM Tool Efficiency With Marginal Tool Utility31m◆Simplicity Paradox: Debunking myths about prompting and datasets for LLM evaluation31m◆LIGO-PINN: Learned Initialization via Gated Optimization to Alleviate Convergence Failures in Physics Informed Neural Networks31m◆OmniaBench: Benchmarking General AI Agents Across Diverse Scenarios31m◆When AI Blurs the Boundaries of Contribution: An Empirical Study of Authorship Calibration31m◆Digital Pantheon: Simulating and Auditing Coalition Formation with LLM Agents31m◆Inoculation Adapters: Improved Selective Generalization of Capabilities with Fewer Surprising Backdoors31m◆ANet Patu-1: The Value of Connection in the Agent Network31m◆Automatically Evolving Prompt Guidelines for Task-Specific Optimization31m◆MAPS: Modeling Co-Existing Subjective Perspectives and Shared Meaning in Multi-Agent Cognitive Dialogue31m◆Automatic Hard Example Synthesis with Multi-Level Agentic Data Curation31m◆Tracing LLM Behavior to the Training Data with Empirical Next-Token Distributions31m◆Introspection Fine-Tuning (IFT): Training Small LLMs to Introspect31m◆The Steering Budget: Examples beat Knobs31m◆Polestar: Drift-Aware Cache Calibration and Token Commitment for Efficient Inference of Diffusion LLMs31m◆RxBrain: Embodied Cognition Foundation Model with Joint Language-Visual Reasoning and Imagination31m◆When a Verified World Model Still Loses: Play-Adequacy vs Prediction-Accuracy in LLM-Synthesized Code World Models31m◆SAGA: Schema-Aware Grounding for Agentic Text-to-SPARQL Generation31m◆ReasFlow: Assisting Reasoning-Centric Scientific Discovery in Applied Mathematics via a Knowledge-Based Multi-Agent System31m◆LBA: Textual Hard-Label Adversarial Attack under Low Query Budgets31m◆Eta Given Delta: Defining LLM Tool Efficiency With Marginal Tool Utility31m◆Simplicity Paradox: Debunking myths about prompting and datasets for LLM evaluation31m◆LIGO-PINN: Learned Initialization via Gated Optimization to Alleviate Convergence Failures in Physics Informed Neural Networks31m◆OmniaBench: Benchmarking General AI Agents Across Diverse Scenarios31m◆When AI Blurs the Boundaries of Contribution: An Empirical Study of Authorship Calibration31m◆Digital Pantheon: Simulating and Auditing Coalition Formation with LLM Agents31m◆Inoculation Adapters: Improved Selective Generalization of Capabilities with Fewer Surprising Backdoors31m◆ANet Patu-1: The Value of Connection in the Agent Network31m◆Automatically Evolving Prompt Guidelines for Task-Specific Optimization31m◆MAPS: Modeling Co-Existing Subjective Perspectives and Shared Meaning in Multi-Agent Cognitive Dialogue31m◆Automatic Hard Example Synthesis with Multi-Level Agentic Data Curation31m◆Tracing LLM Behavior to the Training Data with Empirical Next-Token Distributions31m◆Introspection Fine-Tuning (IFT): Training Small LLMs to Introspect31m◆
News/LocateAnything: Fast and High-Quality Vision-Language Grounding with Parallel Box Decoding
arxiv
PublishedMay 28, 2026 at 4:00 AM

LocateAnything: Fast and High-Quality Vision-Language Grounding with Parallel Box Decoding

Source
arxiv.orgfull article ↗
Read on arxiv→
Publisher summary· verbatim

arXiv:2605.27365v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) commonly formulate visual grounding and detection as a coordinate-token generation problem, serializing each 2D box into multiple 1D tokens that are learned and decoded largely independently. This token-by-token

Stay posted· Newsletter

A 5-min weekly brief — top movers, price watch, story of the week.

// no spam · unsubscribe one-click · free forever

Discussion
Source
↗
arxiv
Read original ↗All from arxiv →

No replies yet. Be first.

Source
↗
arxiv
Read original ↗All from arxiv →

Related coverage

More from ARXIV
arxivThe Steering Budget: Examples beat Knobs31marxivPolestar: Drift-Aware Cache Calibration and Token Commitment for Efficient Inference of Diffusion LLMs31marxivRxBrain: Embodied Cognition Foundation Model with Joint Language-Visual Reasoning and Imagination31marxivWhen a Verified World Model Still Loses: Play-Adequacy vs Prediction-Accuracy in LLM-Synthesized Code World Models31m
The Bubble Brief
WEEKLY

Read AI insights every Tuesday — top movers, new releases, story of the week.

// no spam · unsubscribe one-click · free forever

Originally published on arxiv ↗
HomeModelsNews