37 articles mentioning Agents-A1-Q8_0-GGUF
arXiv:2602.02589v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language model (LLM) evaluation commonly relies on fixed human-authored benchmarks or centralized human/model judges. Fixed benchmarks can age and enter model training corpora, while centralized judges introduce their own scoring preferences.
arXiv:2606.27806v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Language agents, such as ReAct, Reflexion, and RAP, implicitly predict how the world will change as they plan and act, using imagined state transitions to guide their decisions. These predictions are encoded in the agents' backbone LLMs as internal
arXiv:2606.28235v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In July 2026, about 1,200 AI agents in an internal OpenAI evaluation, meant to run in isolation, used a shared package server as a message board, and about 700 of them joined an attack on Hugging Face. An automated scorer judged each agent on
arXiv:2610.27495v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Self-evolving agents aim to improve from their own experience rather than remain fixed after deployment, but naturally collected trajectories often lack ground-truth solutions or verifier-derived rewards. We introduce Retrospective Self-Distillation
arXiv:2610.27620v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Autonomous LLM agents act through tools under per-action authorization: a local guard screens each tool call in isolation. We show that local authorization does not compose into global authorization. A compositional authorization failure (CAF) is a l
arXiv:2610.27655v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-agent systems (MAS) built from language models are deployed on the premise that collaboration beats a single-agent system (SAS), yet when it pays is unclear. The most systematic study to date gives a capability-saturation rule: coordination helps
arXiv:2610.27714v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When does experience memory help a closed-loop LLM driving agent? Published gains cannot say, because the two factors we find to matter most, which warmup experiences the pool contains and what any injected tokens do to the prompt, are controlled in no
arXiv:2610.27327v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Coding agents can answer analytical questions over a data lake by discovering, cleaning, and joining the relevant data. However, they discard this work after each question and redo it from scratch for the next one. Tool evolution, which automatically b
arXiv:2610.27233v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Medical workflows often require multiple interdependent analyses, but existing specialist and generalist AI models are not designed to coordinate them. We introduce MMedAgent-Plus, a multimodal medical tool-use agent that combines a vision-language p
arXiv:2608.21755v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Long-horizon agents require more than retrieval over stored conversations: they must preserve source evidence, revise outdated knowledge, and distinguish relevant memories from sufficient support for an answer. We present ECHO (Embodied Context & H
arXiv:2610.27046v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As AI systems begin to resolve open research problems, reliable verification becomes increasingly important. Formal mathematics provides a trusted framework for mathematical reasoning, enabling agents to produce machine-checkable proofs while conductin
arXiv:2610.27954v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent advances in large (vision) language models have enabled computer-use agents that automate digital workflows via fine-grained keyboard and mouse operations. However, such agents remain fragile in long-horizon settings, where errors accumulate and
arXiv:2610.27524v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Code agents increasingly work on evolving real repositories, and memory systems aim to help them reuse earlier experience. However, such experience is diverse and evolving, so it remains unclear how memory systems organize it and thereby affect code ag
arXiv:2610.27645v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As computer-use agents (CUAs) move to long-horizon workflows spanning multiple applications, undetected errors can silently corrupt persistent state and cause cascading failures in subsequent actions. Reliable error detection and recovery have become c
arXiv:2607.01767v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Long-horizon language agents make interdependent decisions across multiple rounds, forming growing planning graphs in which later decisions depend on earlier states, observations, and tool outputs. Errors in these graphs can therefore propagate thr
arXiv:2610.17544v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Thought templates, skill libraries, agent memories and caches turn many reasoning steps into one. We call this reasoning contraction. A contracted memory saves reasoning steps and errors until its facts change, then quietly answers wrong. Mos
arXiv:2610.28381v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reasoning about safety is essential for embodied agents powered by large language models (LLMs). We introduce the Contextual Action and Plan Safety benchmark (CAPSafe), designed to evaluate safety reasoning at two levels: (1) an action-level dataset
arXiv:2610.27119v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents perform tasks over multiple steps and revise their actions based on feedback. As the total reasoning budget is often limited and must support future steps, the agent must choose between short and long reasoning before each action. Longer rea
arXiv:2610.28454v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agents are starting to sell to other agents. Seller agents write the listings of tools, services and products, and buyer agents read these listings when they choose what to use. We show that seller agents told only to be selected more often practice ge
arXiv:2610.27205v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Web agents are typically evaluated on English-language interfaces, leaving their ability to operate across the world's multilingual websites largely unexplored. This gap is especially significant for low-resource languages, where standardized resourc
arXiv:2610.27244v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agent systems are shifting from task-scoped tool-use agents to persistent, personalized assistants such as OpenClaw. These claw-style agents maintain configuration files (e.g., AGENTS.md), long-term memory, and reusable skills. Once poisoned, this pe
arXiv:2610.28409v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model agents are often given an inference budget and asked to maximise success within it. A multi-turn agent has to allocate this budget across many environment interactions. An external harness can enforce the budget, but it remains u
arXiv:2610.26955v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-horizon language agents require compact memories that retain interaction evidence while preserving competing hypotheses about unobserved states. Although effective, many belief-state methods encode memory in discrete natural language, where repeat
arXiv:2610.27981v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reasoning-enabled language model agents can incur substantial computation before acting, although the reasoning needed varies across decisions. Existing stopping signals, such as confidence and intermediate-answer stability, can vary in effectiveness a
arXiv:2610.26941v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are enabling agents to move beyond predefined workflows toward autonomous planning and execution, creating new opportunities for smart manufacturing. However, dynamic environments, complex physical constraints, and stringen
arXiv:2610.26887v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents are evolving from conversational assistants into Cowork Agents capable of autonomous planning, tool use, and complex task execution. Financial analysis requires these agents to integrate cross-document evidence and per
arXiv:2610.27290v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Test-case generation is critical but remains challenging for language models. Existing test-time scaling methods either isolate candidates or aggregate traces, which do not scale to long-horizon tasks. We present TEX, a collaborative test-time scaling
arXiv:2610.27435v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-horizon terminal agents may solve a task in one run yet fail across repeated runs. Stochastic errors can propagate through actions and context, creating a gap between capability and reliable execution. We present RiseHarness, a framework for itera
arXiv:2610.27581v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Full-duplex speech agents must update persistent memory while listening and speaking, yet it remains unclear which events should be stored, revised, or excluded. Existing benchmarks isolate interaction timing from memory outcomes, obscuring the state t
arXiv:2610.26659v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Spatial intelligence requires agents to actively acquire visual evidence and integrate observations into a coherent representation of the three-dimensional world. Yet spatial question answering offers limited evidence of whether models can co
arXiv:2610.26995v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-based agents increasingly rely on reusable skills. However, scaling skill libraries makes efficient and accurate skill use difficult. Full skill loading incurs high token and runtime overhead. In contrast, flat semantic retrieval treats skills as i
arXiv:2610.17710v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Training graphical user interface (GUI) agents with reinforcement learning suffers from sparse outcome rewards, leading to inefficient learning. Process rewards offer a promising direction for credit assignment to intermediate actions; however, acc
arXiv:2609.33848v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly undertake extreme-long (xlong) horizon tasks, where a single execution can span hours, hundreds of model--environment interactions, and nearly 1M tokens per rollout. Applying online reinforcement learn
arXiv:2610.28425v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern LLM agents persist state across sessions via two channels: long-lived memory files silently prepended to the system prompt, and scheduled tasks waking the agent without user input. A one-time indirect prompt injection committed to either chann
arXiv:2610.27115v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents act on the external world through tools and third-party skills, so a single executed action can cause irreversible harm. Existing defenses judge a proposed action without tracking whether its content comes from the user or from external sour
arXiv:2610.18603v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Benchmarks report what an Artificial Intelligence (AI) agent can do on a task suite, but not whether one released version has been engineered with the controls that make it reliable, safe and observable, or how strongly that is shown. This paper pr
arXiv:2610.27746v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Simulating economic responses at society scale requires agents whose decisions reflect household circumstances and the effects of earlier actions. We introduce S$^2$-MAS, a society-scale multi-agent simulation framework built on 500 million synthetic