·
DataBubble
  • Home
  • Models
  • News
  • Compare
  • Boards
  • Pricing
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Methodology
  • Contact
Latest
Mathematicians want proof OpenAI didn’t use their work3h◆Powering AI is an architecture problem3h◆Planning and Scheduling Business Processes under Control-Flow Uncertainty10h◆A Hierarchical Consistency Framework for Auditing Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems10h◆Risk Is Not Review Value: Wrong-Answer Exposure Under Bounded Review Budgets10h◆From Simulated Citizens to Simulated Deliberation: Challenges in Representation and Interaction10h◆FinCUABuild: Can Agents Build Reliable Benchmarks for Dynamic Financial Computer Use?10h◆AgentIdeaBench: Benchmarking Scientific Ideation in the Agent Era10h◆Norms at a Price: Why RL-Based Alignment Can Promise Conditional Compliance at Best10h◆A radiographic world model for clinical reasoning and evidence generation10h◆The Profit Alignment Problem: How Profit Mandates Induce Alignment Failures in LLMs10h◆When Intelligence Becomes Agency: A Theory of Governed, Proactive Agency for Symbiotic AI Systems10h◆Do Large Language Models Know What They Don't Know II? A Fully Behavioral, Non-Cognitive Measure of Epistemic Honesty10h◆Explainable Temporal Attention-based Defect Detection For Fillet Joints in Real-Time Gas Metal Arc Welding Based on Multi-modal Data10h◆Quantization Amplifies Determinism, Not Bias: Scale-Dependent Behavioral Effects of Serving-Time Weight Compression10h◆PRIMUS: Identity, Governance, and Verification for Multi-Agent Federations10h◆Co-Evolving Harnesses and Models: On-Policy Correction Helps Weaker Models Catch Up Where Imitation Fails10h◆A Data-Driven Framework for Identifying and Prioritizing RPA Opportunities in Healthcare Processes10h◆Robots Influencing Humans to Reveal their Goals during Collaboration and Competition10h◆An Agent Model Abstraction for Human-AI Teaming Cognitive Coupling10h◆Mathematicians want proof OpenAI didn’t use their work3h◆Powering AI is an architecture problem3h◆Planning and Scheduling Business Processes under Control-Flow Uncertainty10h◆A Hierarchical Consistency Framework for Auditing Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems10h◆Risk Is Not Review Value: Wrong-Answer Exposure Under Bounded Review Budgets10h◆From Simulated Citizens to Simulated Deliberation: Challenges in Representation and Interaction10h◆FinCUABuild: Can Agents Build Reliable Benchmarks for Dynamic Financial Computer Use?10h◆AgentIdeaBench: Benchmarking Scientific Ideation in the Agent Era10h◆Norms at a Price: Why RL-Based Alignment Can Promise Conditional Compliance at Best10h◆A radiographic world model for clinical reasoning and evidence generation10h◆The Profit Alignment Problem: How Profit Mandates Induce Alignment Failures in LLMs10h◆When Intelligence Becomes Agency: A Theory of Governed, Proactive Agency for Symbiotic AI Systems10h◆Do Large Language Models Know What They Don't Know II? A Fully Behavioral, Non-Cognitive Measure of Epistemic Honesty10h◆Explainable Temporal Attention-based Defect Detection For Fillet Joints in Real-Time Gas Metal Arc Welding Based on Multi-modal Data10h◆Quantization Amplifies Determinism, Not Bias: Scale-Dependent Behavioral Effects of Serving-Time Weight Compression10h◆PRIMUS: Identity, Governance, and Verification for Multi-Agent Federations10h◆Co-Evolving Harnesses and Models: On-Policy Correction Helps Weaker Models Catch Up Where Imitation Fails10h◆A Data-Driven Framework for Identifying and Prioritizing RPA Opportunities in Healthcare Processes10h◆Robots Influencing Humans to Reveal their Goals during Collaboration and Competition10h◆An Agent Model Abstraction for Human-AI Teaming Cognitive Coupling10h◆
News/The Blind Spot of Agent Safety: How Benign User Instructions Expose Critical Vulnerabilities in Computer-Use Agents
arxiv
PublishedApril 21, 2026 at 4:00 AM
▼bearish

The Blind Spot of Agent Safety: How Benign User Instructions Expose Critical Vulnerabilities in Computer-Use Agents

Source
arxiv.orgfull article ↗
Read on arxiv→
Publisher summary· verbatim

arXiv:2604.10577v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Computer-use agents (CUAs) can now autonomously complete complex tasks in real digital environments, but when misled, they can also be used to automate harmful actions programmatically. Existing safety evaluations largely target explicit thre

Stay posted· Newsletter

A 5-min weekly brief — top movers, price watch, story of the week.

// no spam · unsubscribe one-click · free forever

Discussion
Mentioned models
01
  • 01
    Claude 4.5 Sonnet
Source
↗
arxiv
Read original ↗All from arxiv →
Tags
04
#safety#security#benchmark#vulnerability

No replies yet. Be first.

Mentioned models
01
  • 01
    Claude 4.5 Sonnet
Source
↗
arxiv
Read original ↗All from arxiv →
Tags
04
#safety#security#benchmark#vulnerability

Related coverage

More from ARXIV
arxivPlanning and Scheduling Business Processes under Control-Flow Uncertainty10harxivA Hierarchical Consistency Framework for Auditing Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems10harxivRisk Is Not Review Value: Wrong-Answer Exposure Under Bounded Review Budgets10harxivFrom Simulated Citizens to Simulated Deliberation: Challenges in Representation and Interaction10h
The Bubble Brief
WEEKLY

Read safety insights every Tuesday — top movers, new releases, story of the week.

// no spam · unsubscribe one-click · free forever

Originally published on arxiv ↗
HomeModelsNews