arxiv
PublishedJune 12, 2026 at 4:00 AM
▼bearish
Two Wrongs, No Right: Auditing Social-Desirability Bias in LLM Annotators for Computational Social Science
Publisher summary· verbatim
arXiv:2606.12426v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM annotators are increasingly used in computational social science (CSS), but it is unclear whether their alignment-shaped errors preserve the empirical conclusions a researcher would report. We audit three open-source 7B instruction-tuned models (
Stay posted· Newsletter
Three short emails a week: Monday, Wednesday and Friday. Top movers, new models and the most-referenced story.
Your email is used only to send The Bubble Brief. Privacy policy
Discussion
No replies yet. Be first.
Related coverage
More from ARXIV
arxivA Diversity Diet for a Healthier Model: A Case Study of French ModernBERT3harxivA Cross-lingual Comparison of Human and Classification Model Entrainment Behavior in Code-switched Speech Settings3harxivRomanized Arabic Across Dialects: Views, Usage Patterns, and Linguistic Variation3harxivWhen Humans Leave Context Unsaid: Implicit Context as a Risk for Large Language Models3hThe Bubble Brief
MON · WED · FRIRead bias insights every Monday, Wednesday and Friday — top movers, new models, story of the week.
Your email is used only to send The Bubble Brief. Privacy policy
Originally published on arxiv ↗