arxiv
PublishedJune 12, 2026 at 4:00 AM
Two Wrongs, No Right: Auditing Social-Desirability Bias in LLM Annotators for Computational Social Science
Publisher summary· verbatim
arXiv:2606.12426v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM annotators are increasingly used in computational social science (CSS), but it is unclear whether their alignment-shaped errors preserve the empirical conclusions a researcher would report. We audit three open-source 7B instruction-tuned models (
Stay posted· Newsletter
A 5-min weekly brief — top movers, price watch, story of the week.
Discussion
No replies yet. Be first.
Related coverage
More from ARXIV
arxivLoHoSearch: Benchmarking Long-Horizon Search Agents Beyond the Human Difficulty Ceiling1harxivMulti-Turn Reasoning When Context Arrives in Pieces: Scalable Sharding and Memory-Augmented RL1harxivSkillChain: Closing the Loop on Skill Evolution for Image-Based E-Commerce AI Assistants1harxivNo Hidden Prompts Needed! You Can Game AI Peer Review with Presentation-Only Revisions1hThe Bubble Brief
WEEKLYRead AI insights every Tuesday — top movers, new releases, story of the week.
Originally published on arxiv ↗