arxiv
PublishedJune 12, 2026 at 4:00 AM
▼bearish
Two Wrongs, No Right: Auditing Social-Desirability Bias in LLM Annotators for Computational Social Science
Publisher summary· verbatim
arXiv:2606.12426v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM annotators are increasingly used in computational social science (CSS), but it is unclear whether their alignment-shaped errors preserve the empirical conclusions a researcher would report. We audit three open-source 7B instruction-tuned models (
Stay posted· Newsletter
A 5-min weekly brief — top movers, price watch, story of the week.
Discussion
No replies yet. Be first.
Related coverage
More from ARXIV
arxivA Consensus-Based Framework for Relative Preference Evaluation of Large Language Models1marxivHumanly: A Configurable and Traceable Environment for Human-AI Collaborative Writing1marxivProbing Latent Colombian Identity Inferences in Qwen2.5-7B with Natural Language Autoencoders1marxivKhondo: A Multimodal Benchmark for Document Packet Splitting of Bangla Forms1mThe Bubble Brief
WEEKLYRead bias insights every Tuesday — top movers, new releases, story of the week.
Originally published on arxiv ↗