arxiv
PublishedOctober 31, 2026 at 4:00 AM
Where Do Vision Language Models Fail at 3D Reasoning?
Publisher summary· verbatim
arXiv:2610.39639v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language models can get individual judgments right while struggling to recover and consistently use the exact properties of a 3D object. To characterize this gap, we introduce BedBench, a controlled benchmark of thirteen procedurally generated
Stay posted· Newsletter
Three short emails a week: Monday, Wednesday and Friday. Top movers, new models and the most-referenced story.
Your email is used only to send The Bubble Brief. Privacy policy
Discussion
No replies yet. Be first.
Related coverage
More from ARXIV
arxivWhat Does an Ontology Catch? Curated, LLM-Generated and Data-Derived Ontologies as Checkers of LLM Agents over Knowledge Graphs3harxivGAUSS: A Workload-Aware Analytical and Monte-Carlo Simulator for LLM Inference Serving3harxivAlgorithmic Bias from the Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals3harxivEvaluating Causal Reasoning in LLMs: A Case Study in the Challenges of Procedural Generation3hThe Bubble Brief
MON · WED · FRIRead AI insights every Monday, Wednesday and Friday — top movers, new models, story of the week.
Your email is used only to send The Bubble Brief. Privacy policy
Originally published on arxiv ↗