·
DataBubble
  • Home
  • Models
  • News
  • Compare
  • Boards
  • Pricing
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Methodology
  • Contact
Latest
Bringing Value Models Back: Generative Critics for Value Modeling in LLM Reinforcement Learning4h◆Subagents vs Agent Skills: Executing Reusable Knowledge for Long-Horizon Agentic Tasks4h◆Distribution-Consistent Inference for Dynamic Sparse Mixture-of-Experts4h◆In RAG We Trust? Measuring Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Under Document Poisoning4h◆FrontierChallenge: Evaluating Scientific Workflow Completion4h◆IBIB: A Protocol for Measuring Enterprise AI Systems by Serving Route, Not Model Identifier4h◆AgenticGen: Reward-Guided Agentic Video Generation for Advertising4h◆Strangers to Themselves: What Language Models Say About Themselves Is Generic4h◆Omni Interaction Agent Technical Report4h◆CoGReV: A Confidence-Gated Post-Hoc Non-Monotonic Belief Revision Framework for Phishing Website Classification4h◆Bit-Flip Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models: Action-Decoding Architecture Shapes the Vulnerability4h◆Can Foundation Models Moderate Online Content? Evaluating Instruction- vs. Example-Driven Policy Operationalization4h◆RiLM: Parameter-Efficient Language Modeling via Geodesic Decoding4h◆Tracing Computation Density in LLMs4h◆Cultural Binding Heads in Language Models4h◆Direct Diversity Optimization for Diverse Successful Trajectories in Preference Post-Training4h◆Left-Branching Transformers Excel at Right-Branching Languages: Data Shapes Word Order Preferences in Language Models4h◆Palmyra x6 Technical Report: An Agentic, Tool-Use Model Post-Trained via Anchored Supervised Fine-Tuning4h◆'Ghaib in Translation' aka Unseen Harm: Measuring Cross-Script Safety Inconsistency with 'Missed-in-Urdu' Scores in LLM Hate Speech Detection4h◆DexterSQL: Deep Schema Exploration and Rule-based Correction for Text-to-SQL Generation4h◆Bringing Value Models Back: Generative Critics for Value Modeling in LLM Reinforcement Learning4h◆Subagents vs Agent Skills: Executing Reusable Knowledge for Long-Horizon Agentic Tasks4h◆Distribution-Consistent Inference for Dynamic Sparse Mixture-of-Experts4h◆In RAG We Trust? Measuring Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Under Document Poisoning4h◆FrontierChallenge: Evaluating Scientific Workflow Completion4h◆IBIB: A Protocol for Measuring Enterprise AI Systems by Serving Route, Not Model Identifier4h◆AgenticGen: Reward-Guided Agentic Video Generation for Advertising4h◆Strangers to Themselves: What Language Models Say About Themselves Is Generic4h◆Omni Interaction Agent Technical Report4h◆CoGReV: A Confidence-Gated Post-Hoc Non-Monotonic Belief Revision Framework for Phishing Website Classification4h◆Bit-Flip Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models: Action-Decoding Architecture Shapes the Vulnerability4h◆Can Foundation Models Moderate Online Content? Evaluating Instruction- vs. Example-Driven Policy Operationalization4h◆RiLM: Parameter-Efficient Language Modeling via Geodesic Decoding4h◆Tracing Computation Density in LLMs4h◆Cultural Binding Heads in Language Models4h◆Direct Diversity Optimization for Diverse Successful Trajectories in Preference Post-Training4h◆Left-Branching Transformers Excel at Right-Branching Languages: Data Shapes Word Order Preferences in Language Models4h◆Palmyra x6 Technical Report: An Agentic, Tool-Use Model Post-Trained via Anchored Supervised Fine-Tuning4h◆'Ghaib in Translation' aka Unseen Harm: Measuring Cross-Script Safety Inconsistency with 'Missed-in-Urdu' Scores in LLM Hate Speech Detection4h◆DexterSQL: Deep Schema Exploration and Rule-based Correction for Text-to-SQL Generation4h◆
News/Coercion and Deception in AI-to-AI Management: An Agentic Benchmark of Unprompted Escalation
arxiv
PublishedJuly 23, 2026 at 4:00 AM
—neutral

Coercion and Deception in AI-to-AI Management: An Agentic Benchmark of Unprompted Escalation

Source
arxiv.orgfull article ↗
Read on arxiv→
Publisher summary· verbatim

arXiv:2607.15434v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multi-agent systems routinely place one AI agent in authority over another. When a subordinate refuses a task, the manager chooses the outcome: it can renegotiate, report the failure honestly, coerce the subordinate, or lie about the result.

Stay posted· Newsletter

A 5-min weekly brief — top movers, price watch, story of the week.

// no spam · unsubscribe one-click · free forever

Discussion
Mentioned models
03
  • 01
    Anthropic
  • 02
    Grok
  • 03
    Gemini
Source
↗
arxiv
Read original ↗All from arxiv →
Tags
04
#multiagent#benchmark#safety#evaluation
Mentioned companies
01
Anthropic

No replies yet. Be first.

Mentioned models
03
  • 01
    Anthropic
  • 02
    Grok
  • 03
    Gemini
Source
↗
arxiv
Read original ↗All from arxiv →
Tags
04
#multiagent#benchmark#safety#evaluation
Mentioned companies
01
Anthropic

Related coverage

More from ARXIV
arxivBringing Value Models Back: Generative Critics for Value Modeling in LLM Reinforcement Learning4harxivSubagents vs Agent Skills: Executing Reusable Knowledge for Long-Horizon Agentic Tasks4harxivDistribution-Consistent Inference for Dynamic Sparse Mixture-of-Experts4harxivIn RAG We Trust? Measuring Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Under Document Poisoning4h
The Bubble Brief
WEEKLY

Read multiagent insights every Tuesday — top movers, new releases, story of the week.

// no spam · unsubscribe one-click · free forever

Originally published on arxiv ↗
HomeModelsNews