·
DataBubble
  • Home
  • Models
  • News
  • Compare
  • Boards
  • Pricing
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Methodology
  • Contact
Latest
Bringing Value Models Back: Generative Critics for Value Modeling in LLM Reinforcement Learning8h◆Subagents vs Agent Skills: Executing Reusable Knowledge for Long-Horizon Agentic Tasks8h◆Distribution-Consistent Inference for Dynamic Sparse Mixture-of-Experts8h◆In RAG We Trust? Measuring Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Under Document Poisoning8h◆FrontierChallenge: Evaluating Scientific Workflow Completion8h◆IBIB: A Protocol for Measuring Enterprise AI Systems by Serving Route, Not Model Identifier8h◆AgenticGen: Reward-Guided Agentic Video Generation for Advertising8h◆Strangers to Themselves: What Language Models Say About Themselves Is Generic8h◆Omni Interaction Agent Technical Report8h◆CoGReV: A Confidence-Gated Post-Hoc Non-Monotonic Belief Revision Framework for Phishing Website Classification8h◆Bit-Flip Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models: Action-Decoding Architecture Shapes the Vulnerability8h◆Can Foundation Models Moderate Online Content? Evaluating Instruction- vs. Example-Driven Policy Operationalization8h◆RiLM: Parameter-Efficient Language Modeling via Geodesic Decoding8h◆Tracing Computation Density in LLMs8h◆Cultural Binding Heads in Language Models8h◆Direct Diversity Optimization for Diverse Successful Trajectories in Preference Post-Training8h◆Left-Branching Transformers Excel at Right-Branching Languages: Data Shapes Word Order Preferences in Language Models8h◆Palmyra x6 Technical Report: An Agentic, Tool-Use Model Post-Trained via Anchored Supervised Fine-Tuning8h◆'Ghaib in Translation' aka Unseen Harm: Measuring Cross-Script Safety Inconsistency with 'Missed-in-Urdu' Scores in LLM Hate Speech Detection8h◆DexterSQL: Deep Schema Exploration and Rule-based Correction for Text-to-SQL Generation8h◆Bringing Value Models Back: Generative Critics for Value Modeling in LLM Reinforcement Learning8h◆Subagents vs Agent Skills: Executing Reusable Knowledge for Long-Horizon Agentic Tasks8h◆Distribution-Consistent Inference for Dynamic Sparse Mixture-of-Experts8h◆In RAG We Trust? Measuring Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Under Document Poisoning8h◆FrontierChallenge: Evaluating Scientific Workflow Completion8h◆IBIB: A Protocol for Measuring Enterprise AI Systems by Serving Route, Not Model Identifier8h◆AgenticGen: Reward-Guided Agentic Video Generation for Advertising8h◆Strangers to Themselves: What Language Models Say About Themselves Is Generic8h◆Omni Interaction Agent Technical Report8h◆CoGReV: A Confidence-Gated Post-Hoc Non-Monotonic Belief Revision Framework for Phishing Website Classification8h◆Bit-Flip Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models: Action-Decoding Architecture Shapes the Vulnerability8h◆Can Foundation Models Moderate Online Content? Evaluating Instruction- vs. Example-Driven Policy Operationalization8h◆RiLM: Parameter-Efficient Language Modeling via Geodesic Decoding8h◆Tracing Computation Density in LLMs8h◆Cultural Binding Heads in Language Models8h◆Direct Diversity Optimization for Diverse Successful Trajectories in Preference Post-Training8h◆Left-Branching Transformers Excel at Right-Branching Languages: Data Shapes Word Order Preferences in Language Models8h◆Palmyra x6 Technical Report: An Agentic, Tool-Use Model Post-Trained via Anchored Supervised Fine-Tuning8h◆'Ghaib in Translation' aka Unseen Harm: Measuring Cross-Script Safety Inconsistency with 'Missed-in-Urdu' Scores in LLM Hate Speech Detection8h◆DexterSQL: Deep Schema Exploration and Rule-based Correction for Text-to-SQL Generation8h◆
News/EpiBench: Verifiable Evaluation of AI Agents on Epigenomics Analysis
arxiv
PublishedJune 12, 2026 at 4:00 AM
—neutral

EpiBench: Verifiable Evaluation of AI Agents on Epigenomics Analysis

Source
arxiv.orgfull article ↗
Read on arxiv→
Publisher summary· verbatim

arXiv:2606.13602v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We introduce EpiBench, a verifiable benchmark for short-horizon epigenomics analysis. EpiBench evaluates whether agents can make well-defined analysis decisions from realistic workflow states and return deterministically gradable answers. The benchmark

Stay posted· Newsletter

A 5-min weekly brief — top movers, price watch, story of the week.

// no spam · unsubscribe one-click · free forever

Discussion
Mentioned models
04
  • 01
    GPT-5.5
  • 02
    GPT-5.4
  • 03
    Claude Opus 4.8 Max
  • 04
    OpenAI Codex
Source
↗
arxiv
Read original ↗All from arxiv →
Tags
04
#benchmark#evaluation#epigenomics#ai
Mentioned companies
01
OpenAI

No replies yet. Be first.

Mentioned models
04
  • 01
    GPT-5.5
  • 02
    GPT-5.4
  • 03
    Claude Opus 4.8 Max
  • 04
    OpenAI Codex
Source
↗
arxiv
Read original ↗All from arxiv →
Tags
04
#benchmark#evaluation#epigenomics#ai
Mentioned companies
01
OpenAI

Related coverage

More from ARXIV
arxivBringing Value Models Back: Generative Critics for Value Modeling in LLM Reinforcement Learning8harxivSubagents vs Agent Skills: Executing Reusable Knowledge for Long-Horizon Agentic Tasks8harxivDistribution-Consistent Inference for Dynamic Sparse Mixture-of-Experts8harxivIn RAG We Trust? Measuring Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Under Document Poisoning8h
The Bubble Brief
WEEKLY

Read benchmark insights every Tuesday — top movers, new releases, story of the week.

// no spam · unsubscribe one-click · free forever

Originally published on arxiv ↗
HomeModelsNews