arxiv
PublishedMay 5, 2026 at 4:00 AM
—neutral
Evaluating Legal Reasoning Traces with Legal Issue Tree Rubrics
Publisher summary· verbatim
arXiv:2512.01020v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Evaluating the quality of LLM-generated reasoning traces in expert domains (e.g., law) is essential for ensuring credibility and explainability, yet remains challenging due to the inherent complexity of such reasoning tasks. We introduce LEGIT (LEG
Stay posted· Newsletter
A 5-min weekly brief — top movers, price watch, story of the week.
Discussion
No replies yet. Be first.
Related coverage
More from ARXIV
arxivBringing Value Models Back: Generative Critics for Value Modeling in LLM Reinforcement Learning9harxivSubagents vs Agent Skills: Executing Reusable Knowledge for Long-Horizon Agentic Tasks9harxivDistribution-Consistent Inference for Dynamic Sparse Mixture-of-Experts9harxivIn RAG We Trust? Measuring Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Under Document Poisoning9hThe Bubble Brief
WEEKLYRead evaluation insights every Tuesday — top movers, new releases, story of the week.
Originally published on arxiv ↗