·
DataBubble
  • Home
  • Models
  • News
  • Compare
  • Boards
  • Pricing
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Methodology
  • Contact
Latest
Mathematicians want proof OpenAI didn’t use their work3h◆Powering AI is an architecture problem3h◆Planning and Scheduling Business Processes under Control-Flow Uncertainty10h◆A Hierarchical Consistency Framework for Auditing Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems10h◆Risk Is Not Review Value: Wrong-Answer Exposure Under Bounded Review Budgets10h◆From Simulated Citizens to Simulated Deliberation: Challenges in Representation and Interaction10h◆FinCUABuild: Can Agents Build Reliable Benchmarks for Dynamic Financial Computer Use?10h◆AgentIdeaBench: Benchmarking Scientific Ideation in the Agent Era10h◆Norms at a Price: Why RL-Based Alignment Can Promise Conditional Compliance at Best10h◆A radiographic world model for clinical reasoning and evidence generation10h◆The Profit Alignment Problem: How Profit Mandates Induce Alignment Failures in LLMs10h◆When Intelligence Becomes Agency: A Theory of Governed, Proactive Agency for Symbiotic AI Systems10h◆Do Large Language Models Know What They Don't Know II? A Fully Behavioral, Non-Cognitive Measure of Epistemic Honesty10h◆Explainable Temporal Attention-based Defect Detection For Fillet Joints in Real-Time Gas Metal Arc Welding Based on Multi-modal Data10h◆Quantization Amplifies Determinism, Not Bias: Scale-Dependent Behavioral Effects of Serving-Time Weight Compression10h◆PRIMUS: Identity, Governance, and Verification for Multi-Agent Federations10h◆Co-Evolving Harnesses and Models: On-Policy Correction Helps Weaker Models Catch Up Where Imitation Fails10h◆A Data-Driven Framework for Identifying and Prioritizing RPA Opportunities in Healthcare Processes10h◆Robots Influencing Humans to Reveal their Goals during Collaboration and Competition10h◆An Agent Model Abstraction for Human-AI Teaming Cognitive Coupling10h◆Mathematicians want proof OpenAI didn’t use their work3h◆Powering AI is an architecture problem3h◆Planning and Scheduling Business Processes under Control-Flow Uncertainty10h◆A Hierarchical Consistency Framework for Auditing Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems10h◆Risk Is Not Review Value: Wrong-Answer Exposure Under Bounded Review Budgets10h◆From Simulated Citizens to Simulated Deliberation: Challenges in Representation and Interaction10h◆FinCUABuild: Can Agents Build Reliable Benchmarks for Dynamic Financial Computer Use?10h◆AgentIdeaBench: Benchmarking Scientific Ideation in the Agent Era10h◆Norms at a Price: Why RL-Based Alignment Can Promise Conditional Compliance at Best10h◆A radiographic world model for clinical reasoning and evidence generation10h◆The Profit Alignment Problem: How Profit Mandates Induce Alignment Failures in LLMs10h◆When Intelligence Becomes Agency: A Theory of Governed, Proactive Agency for Symbiotic AI Systems10h◆Do Large Language Models Know What They Don't Know II? A Fully Behavioral, Non-Cognitive Measure of Epistemic Honesty10h◆Explainable Temporal Attention-based Defect Detection For Fillet Joints in Real-Time Gas Metal Arc Welding Based on Multi-modal Data10h◆Quantization Amplifies Determinism, Not Bias: Scale-Dependent Behavioral Effects of Serving-Time Weight Compression10h◆PRIMUS: Identity, Governance, and Verification for Multi-Agent Federations10h◆Co-Evolving Harnesses and Models: On-Policy Correction Helps Weaker Models Catch Up Where Imitation Fails10h◆A Data-Driven Framework for Identifying and Prioritizing RPA Opportunities in Healthcare Processes10h◆Robots Influencing Humans to Reveal their Goals during Collaboration and Competition10h◆An Agent Model Abstraction for Human-AI Teaming Cognitive Coupling10h◆
News/Foundation vs. Specialized Models: Evaluating Catastrophic Forgetting in Continual Time Series Forecasting
arxiv
PublishedJune 29, 2026 at 4:00 AM
—neutral

Foundation vs. Specialized Models: Evaluating Catastrophic Forgetting in Continual Time Series Forecasting

Source
arxiv.orgfull article ↗
Read on arxiv→
Publisher summary· verbatim

arXiv:2510.00809v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: While Time Series Foundation Models (TSFMs) excel in zero-shot tasks, their behavior under continual fine tuning is poorly understood. We present the first systematic study of catastrophic forgetting in TSFMs (TimesFM-2.0, Chronos-2) versus a speci

Stay posted· Newsletter

A 5-min weekly brief — top movers, price watch, story of the week.

// no spam · unsubscribe one-click · free forever

Discussion
Mentioned models
03
  • 01
    TimesFM-2.0
  • 02
    Chronos-2
  • 03
    SamFormer
Source
↗
arxiv
Read original ↗All from arxiv →
Tags
04
#time-series#continual-learning#catastrophic-forgetting#benchmark

No replies yet. Be first.

Mentioned models
03
  • 01
    TimesFM-2.0
  • 02
    Chronos-2
  • 03
    SamFormer
Source
↗
arxiv
Read original ↗All from arxiv →
Tags
04
#time-series#continual-learning#catastrophic-forgetting#benchmark

Related coverage

More from ARXIV
arxivPlanning and Scheduling Business Processes under Control-Flow Uncertainty10harxivA Hierarchical Consistency Framework for Auditing Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems10harxivRisk Is Not Review Value: Wrong-Answer Exposure Under Bounded Review Budgets10harxivFrom Simulated Citizens to Simulated Deliberation: Challenges in Representation and Interaction10h
The Bubble Brief
WEEKLY

Read time-series insights every Tuesday — top movers, new releases, story of the week.

// no spam · unsubscribe one-click · free forever

Originally published on arxiv ↗
HomeModelsNews