arxiv
PublishedJuly 27, 2026 at 4:00 AM
—neutral
Evaluation design conditions the expert-vs-auto MeSH gap: a controlled comparison of bag-of-words and BiomedBERT on the Cohen benchmark
Publisher summary· verbatim
arXiv:2607.21685v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A systematic review begins with someone reading thousands of abstracts to identify the few that are relevant, and classifiers are used to prioritise that reading. Their inputs are often augmented with Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), assigned either by
Models mentioned
01Stay posted· Newsletter
Three short emails a week: Monday, Wednesday and Friday. Top movers, new models and the most-referenced story.
Your email is used only to send The Bubble Brief. Privacy policy
Discussion
No replies yet. Be first.
Related coverage
More from ARXIV
arxivRetrieval Augmented Generation Compositionality11harxivEvolving with Open Worlds: Towards Recursive Self-Improvement for Future Forecasting11harxivTowards English - Mizo Legal Machine Translation: Corpus Creation, Analysis, and Benchmarks11harxivVeriEvolve: Evaluator-First Evolution for Tool-Using Agents11hThe Bubble Brief
MON · WED · FRIRead benchmark insights every Monday, Wednesday and Friday — top movers, new models, story of the week.
Your email is used only to send The Bubble Brief. Privacy policy
Originally published on arxiv ↗