arxiv
PublishedJune 10, 2026 at 4:00 AM
▼bearish
RealMath-Eval: Why SOTA Judges Struggle with Real Human Reasoning
Publisher summary· verbatim
arXiv:2606.10254v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved near-perfect performance in \emph{solving} high-school mathematics, their ability to \emph{evaluate} the diverse reasoning processes of real human students remains under-examined. To bridge this gap, we
Stay posted· Newsletter
Three short emails a week: Monday, Wednesday and Friday. Top movers, new models and the most-referenced story.
Your email is used only to send The Bubble Brief. Privacy policy
Discussion
No replies yet. Be first.
Related coverage
More from ARXIV
arxivAdaPRA: Process Reward Agents with Adaptive Rubrics for Data Science7harxivScoped Semantic Invariance as a Foundation for LLM Reliability7harxivGEMS-RAG: Graph-grounded Engineering Multimodal Standards Retrieval-Augmented Generation7harxivEstimation of Propagated Risk in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems7hThe Bubble Brief
MON · WED · FRIRead evaluation insights every Monday, Wednesday and Friday — top movers, new models, story of the week.
Your email is used only to send The Bubble Brief. Privacy policy
Originally published on arxiv ↗