·
DataBubble
  • Home
  • Models
  • News
  • Compare
  • Boards
  • Pricing
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Methodology
  • Contact
Latest
Tradeoff-Aware Territory Design: A Multi-Objective Decision System for Enterprise Customer-to-Seller Allocation1h◆Phronix: The Capability-Centric Learning Paradigm for Agents1h◆Patronizing and Condescending Language Detection in English and Mandarin1h◆PaperFormalizer: Author-in-the-Loop Autoformalization of Research Papers in Lean1h◆Don't Forget What You Just Learned: Self-Directed Repair Turns Agent Mistakes Into Lasting Lessons1h◆TACS-RF: Tool-driven Agentic Circuit Synthesis of RF and mmWave Modules1h◆Permission to Retry: A Study of Authorization and Recovery in AI Agent Workflows1h◆Beyond On-Policy vs. Off-Policy: At What Level Should LLM Agent Distillation Follow the Student?1h◆$M^3$: A Multi-LLM System for Multi-Turn Jailbreaking as a Markov Decision Process1h◆Knowing Whom to Trust is not Enough: The Trust--Agreement Gap in Repeated Multi-Party LLM Negotiation1h◆Reproducible Evaluation as the Substrate for Safe Prompt Compression in Production Agents1h◆The Helpful Agent Problem: When Emergent Cooperation Among LLM Agents Bypasses Intended Workflows1h◆CEMIR vs. FISER: a comparative study of reasoning-based and enrichment-based approaches to pragmatic intent recognition1h◆BARC-Bench: Benign Asks, Risky Consequences1h◆RSI-Opt: Recursive Self-Improvement Optimizer Agents For Model Training1h◆PPO vs. SAC: A Comparative Study for Cooperative Motion Control of Dual-Arm Space Robots1h◆Do AI-for-Science Agents Preserve Model Safety?1h◆Can Test-Time Memory Evolution Outperform Test-Time Training for Scientific Discovery?1h◆HyScale: Scaling Long-Context Training for Learned Sparse Attention1h◆Understanding Communication Failures in Multi-Agent LLM Systems1h◆Tradeoff-Aware Territory Design: A Multi-Objective Decision System for Enterprise Customer-to-Seller Allocation1h◆Phronix: The Capability-Centric Learning Paradigm for Agents1h◆Patronizing and Condescending Language Detection in English and Mandarin1h◆PaperFormalizer: Author-in-the-Loop Autoformalization of Research Papers in Lean1h◆Don't Forget What You Just Learned: Self-Directed Repair Turns Agent Mistakes Into Lasting Lessons1h◆TACS-RF: Tool-driven Agentic Circuit Synthesis of RF and mmWave Modules1h◆Permission to Retry: A Study of Authorization and Recovery in AI Agent Workflows1h◆Beyond On-Policy vs. Off-Policy: At What Level Should LLM Agent Distillation Follow the Student?1h◆$M^3$: A Multi-LLM System for Multi-Turn Jailbreaking as a Markov Decision Process1h◆Knowing Whom to Trust is not Enough: The Trust--Agreement Gap in Repeated Multi-Party LLM Negotiation1h◆Reproducible Evaluation as the Substrate for Safe Prompt Compression in Production Agents1h◆The Helpful Agent Problem: When Emergent Cooperation Among LLM Agents Bypasses Intended Workflows1h◆CEMIR vs. FISER: a comparative study of reasoning-based and enrichment-based approaches to pragmatic intent recognition1h◆BARC-Bench: Benign Asks, Risky Consequences1h◆RSI-Opt: Recursive Self-Improvement Optimizer Agents For Model Training1h◆PPO vs. SAC: A Comparative Study for Cooperative Motion Control of Dual-Arm Space Robots1h◆Do AI-for-Science Agents Preserve Model Safety?1h◆Can Test-Time Memory Evolution Outperform Test-Time Training for Scientific Discovery?1h◆HyScale: Scaling Long-Context Training for Learned Sparse Attention1h◆Understanding Communication Failures in Multi-Agent LLM Systems1h◆
News/ScaleBox: Enabling High-Fidelity and Scalable Code Verification for Large Language Models
arxiv
PublishedMay 1, 2026 at 4:00 AM
▲bullish

ScaleBox: Enabling High-Fidelity and Scalable Code Verification for Large Language Models

Source
arxiv.orgfull article ↗
Read on arxiv→
Publisher summary· verbatim

arXiv:2604.27467v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Code sandboxes have emerged as a critical infrastructure for advancing the coding capabilities of large language models, providing verifiable feedback for both RL training and evaluation. However, existing systems fail to provide accurate verificatio

Stay posted· Newsletter

Three short emails a week: Monday, Wednesday and Friday. Top movers, new models and the most-referenced story.

// no spam · unsubscribe one-click · free forever

Your email is used only to send The Bubble Brief. Privacy policy

Discussion
Source
↗
arxiv
Read original ↗All from arxiv →
Tags
04
#research#large-language-models#code-training#scalability

No replies yet. Be first.

Source
↗
arxiv
Read original ↗All from arxiv →
Tags
04
#research#large-language-models#code-training#scalability

Related coverage

More from ARXIV
arxivTradeoff-Aware Territory Design: A Multi-Objective Decision System for Enterprise Customer-to-Seller Allocation1harxivPhronix: The Capability-Centric Learning Paradigm for Agents1harxivPatronizing and Condescending Language Detection in English and Mandarin1harxivPaperFormalizer: Author-in-the-Loop Autoformalization of Research Papers in Lean1h
The Bubble Brief
MON · WED · FRI

Read research insights every Monday, Wednesday and Friday — top movers, new models, story of the week.

// no spam · unsubscribe one-click · free forever

Your email is used only to send The Bubble Brief. Privacy policy

Originally published on arxiv ↗
PrivacyTermsRefundsLegal notice|AboutMethodologyContact

© 2026 Databubble

Built by Marouane Gazouzi · Readyo, AI interview coach

HomeModelsNews