·
DataBubble
  • Home
  • Models
  • News
  • Compare
  • Boards
  • Pricing
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Methodology
  • Contact
Latest
Bringing Value Models Back: Generative Critics for Value Modeling in LLM Reinforcement Learning4h◆Subagents vs Agent Skills: Executing Reusable Knowledge for Long-Horizon Agentic Tasks4h◆Distribution-Consistent Inference for Dynamic Sparse Mixture-of-Experts4h◆In RAG We Trust? Measuring Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Under Document Poisoning4h◆FrontierChallenge: Evaluating Scientific Workflow Completion4h◆IBIB: A Protocol for Measuring Enterprise AI Systems by Serving Route, Not Model Identifier4h◆AgenticGen: Reward-Guided Agentic Video Generation for Advertising4h◆Strangers to Themselves: What Language Models Say About Themselves Is Generic4h◆Omni Interaction Agent Technical Report4h◆CoGReV: A Confidence-Gated Post-Hoc Non-Monotonic Belief Revision Framework for Phishing Website Classification4h◆Bit-Flip Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models: Action-Decoding Architecture Shapes the Vulnerability4h◆Can Foundation Models Moderate Online Content? Evaluating Instruction- vs. Example-Driven Policy Operationalization4h◆RiLM: Parameter-Efficient Language Modeling via Geodesic Decoding4h◆Tracing Computation Density in LLMs4h◆Cultural Binding Heads in Language Models4h◆Direct Diversity Optimization for Diverse Successful Trajectories in Preference Post-Training4h◆Left-Branching Transformers Excel at Right-Branching Languages: Data Shapes Word Order Preferences in Language Models4h◆Palmyra x6 Technical Report: An Agentic, Tool-Use Model Post-Trained via Anchored Supervised Fine-Tuning4h◆'Ghaib in Translation' aka Unseen Harm: Measuring Cross-Script Safety Inconsistency with 'Missed-in-Urdu' Scores in LLM Hate Speech Detection4h◆DexterSQL: Deep Schema Exploration and Rule-based Correction for Text-to-SQL Generation4h◆Bringing Value Models Back: Generative Critics for Value Modeling in LLM Reinforcement Learning4h◆Subagents vs Agent Skills: Executing Reusable Knowledge for Long-Horizon Agentic Tasks4h◆Distribution-Consistent Inference for Dynamic Sparse Mixture-of-Experts4h◆In RAG We Trust? Measuring Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Under Document Poisoning4h◆FrontierChallenge: Evaluating Scientific Workflow Completion4h◆IBIB: A Protocol for Measuring Enterprise AI Systems by Serving Route, Not Model Identifier4h◆AgenticGen: Reward-Guided Agentic Video Generation for Advertising4h◆Strangers to Themselves: What Language Models Say About Themselves Is Generic4h◆Omni Interaction Agent Technical Report4h◆CoGReV: A Confidence-Gated Post-Hoc Non-Monotonic Belief Revision Framework for Phishing Website Classification4h◆Bit-Flip Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models: Action-Decoding Architecture Shapes the Vulnerability4h◆Can Foundation Models Moderate Online Content? Evaluating Instruction- vs. Example-Driven Policy Operationalization4h◆RiLM: Parameter-Efficient Language Modeling via Geodesic Decoding4h◆Tracing Computation Density in LLMs4h◆Cultural Binding Heads in Language Models4h◆Direct Diversity Optimization for Diverse Successful Trajectories in Preference Post-Training4h◆Left-Branching Transformers Excel at Right-Branching Languages: Data Shapes Word Order Preferences in Language Models4h◆Palmyra x6 Technical Report: An Agentic, Tool-Use Model Post-Trained via Anchored Supervised Fine-Tuning4h◆'Ghaib in Translation' aka Unseen Harm: Measuring Cross-Script Safety Inconsistency with 'Missed-in-Urdu' Scores in LLM Hate Speech Detection4h◆DexterSQL: Deep Schema Exploration and Rule-based Correction for Text-to-SQL Generation4h◆
News/Toward Localizing and Repairing Bias in Transformer Attention Heads
arxiv
PublishedJuly 15, 2026 at 4:00 AM
—neutral

Toward Localizing and Repairing Bias in Transformer Attention Heads

Source
arxiv.orgfull article ↗
Read on arxiv→
Publisher summary· verbatim

arXiv:2607.12863v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Transformer language models are increasingly used as software components, yet biased outputs remain difficult to localize and repair inside the model. Existing fairness testing and repair methods largely operate at the input-output or retraining leve

Stay posted· Newsletter

A 5-min weekly brief — top movers, price watch, story of the week.

// no spam · unsubscribe one-click · free forever

Discussion
Source
↗
arxiv
Read original ↗All from arxiv →
Tags
04
#fairness#bias#debugging#language-models

No replies yet. Be first.

Source
↗
arxiv
Read original ↗All from arxiv →
Tags
04
#fairness#bias#debugging#language-models

Related coverage

More from ARXIV
arxivBringing Value Models Back: Generative Critics for Value Modeling in LLM Reinforcement Learning4harxivSubagents vs Agent Skills: Executing Reusable Knowledge for Long-Horizon Agentic Tasks4harxivDistribution-Consistent Inference for Dynamic Sparse Mixture-of-Experts4harxivIn RAG We Trust? Measuring Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Under Document Poisoning4h
The Bubble Brief
WEEKLY

Read fairness insights every Tuesday — top movers, new releases, story of the week.

// no spam · unsubscribe one-click · free forever

Originally published on arxiv ↗
HomeModelsNews