arxiv
PublishedOctober 5, 2026 at 4:00 AM
MintEval: Do LLMs Implement the Trading Strategy You Asked For? A Behavioural-Equivalence Benchmark for Natural-Language-to-Strategy Code
Publisher summary· verbatim
arXiv:2610.03080v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models are moving from producing trading signals to writing the code that executes them. The failure mode of the second role is silent: generated code runs, a backtest plots, yet the risk logic that the trader described is not the logi
Stay posted· Newsletter
Three short emails a week: Monday, Wednesday and Friday. Top movers, new models and the most-referenced story.
Your email is used only to send The Bubble Brief. Privacy policy
Discussion
No replies yet. Be first.
Related coverage
More from ARXIV
arxivOptimal Hydra: Model Heterogeneous Federated Learning for LLMs using Data-Informed Hydra-Nets1darxivJudging the Judges: Confidence and Disagreement in Rubrics as Rewards1darxivContent associations with answer selection and engagement in supply chain community question answering1darxivORACLE-SWE: Quantifying the Contribution of Critical Information Signals on SWE Agents1dThe Bubble Brief
MON · WED · FRIRead AI insights every Monday, Wednesday and Friday — top movers, new models, story of the week.
Your email is used only to send The Bubble Brief. Privacy policy
Originally published on arxiv ↗